Comments on: Light green ? Dark green ? https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=962 Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:35:56 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10 By: shorty https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=962&cpage=1#comment-65490 Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:30:21 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=962#comment-65490 It is important to judge for ourselves what is green and what isn’t. Just because it has a label on it, doesn’t mean its 100% environmetal friendly. However I do consider that there is merit in attempts to reduce our environmental footprint. A policy to build a windmill in certain areas to harness natural wind energy is better than a policy of continuing to deplete fossil fuels. Also you might argue that many of our attempts to be more environmentally concious involve a certain amount of guilt. We are now more currently aware that our actions have a considerable impact on the environment; however we also know that we currently have alternatives to reduce this impact, that we should be using when opportunity costs are feasible.

In regards to “greenwashing” I think the more we become habituated to the policy that greener is better, the more we will be able understand how these policies do in fact contribute to a more environmentally friendly society. This might create a standard of market greening. Once the market has run out of new ways to green its products they’ll search for the next gimmick to entice the consumer.

Whether every action reducing our ecological footprint is good is complicated to assess. What may benefit one sector of the environment may have negative impacts on other sectors. For lack of a better example, if you consider a solar panel, it is a natural form of energy use, however you still have to find land space to build these solar panels in the first place which may alter the habitat they are built on. This may also contribute to the beleif that not everything can be made perfectly green.

]]>