Comments on: Science and politics; an unavoidable marriage ? https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1018 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:34:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10 By: guesswho https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1018&cpage=1#comment-65555 Tue, 18 Nov 2008 01:34:32 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1018#comment-65555 Your comment is really interesting. I realise that I can’t really tell what the goal of science should be. I usually assume that researches should have a utility, whether it is to improve our quality of life, or to protect biodiveristy, and any other good reason. But perhaps science doesn’t have utility, just as we are not asking art to reach any other form of utility than simple enjoyment. Maybe that the research for a greater level of knowledge is sufficient in itself to legitimise the need for science.

]]>
By: shorty https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1018&cpage=1#comment-65546 Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:55:41 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1018#comment-65546 Your comment on when scientific activism is appropriate is intriguing. How do you define commercial use? I believe science should have a use, but one that is not trivial. For example the funding for the big bang machine (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7595855.stm) appears slightly trivial with no apparent application. If scientists are involved in political debate they voice what they feel is important. They also bring to the table the knowledge necessary for decision-making.

I agree that science and politics play roles on each other. I would argue the role of the government is for community functioning. The applications of science involve how society views the earth. However one might ask the question of whether scientists are always thinking of the community when they begin their research? If this is not always true this could be one of the ways science is separated from politics, because its original goal is not to serve the community. It may be curiosity over an unknown bit of knowledge. By funding a research project the government says which projects it views as important. If policy is driven by the knowledge science provides the government always uses science. In this way politics cannot be viewed without science, but science may be viewed without politics.

]]>