Comments for Computers, Society, and Nature https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:11:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10 Comment on UCDP GED and Open Data by MTM https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4495&cpage=1#comment-74659 Mon, 02 Nov 2015 18:11:37 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4495#comment-74659 Great concluding question! I am planning on asking a similar question for our discussion tomorrow 🙂

]]>
Comment on The UCDP Dataset: Achieving Information Democracy or Turning Horror into Bland Data? by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4487&cpage=1#comment-74658 Sun, 01 Nov 2015 20:52:36 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4487#comment-74658 An interesting challenge for open data, that it ultimately may do nothing to inform us or to prompt us to enacts substantive changes. In fact, the data may further anesthetize us to the horror, as you say. You might be interested in tweets referring to the recently held Open Government Conference in Mexico City, hashtagged #OGP15

]]>
Comment on Smart cities: who do they benefit? by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4447&cpage=1#comment-74656 Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:47:33 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4447#comment-74656 Would be useful to more directly address the GIS/GIScience aspects of smart cities.

]]>
Comment on Modelling Vague Places – the meaning in a name by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4428&cpage=1#comment-74652 Tue, 20 Oct 2015 02:41:47 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4428#comment-74652 Love your example of vagueness!

]]>
Comment on Embracing Uncertainty? by BannerGrey https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4398&cpage=1#comment-74651 Mon, 19 Oct 2015 01:58:54 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4398#comment-74651 This is a good link, Thanks Denasaur!!!!

]]>
Comment on Rundstrom 1995 by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4293&cpage=1#comment-74631 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:25:57 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4293#comment-74631 “GIScience still seems to be fundamentally incapable of helping us to view uncertainty positively”: Why or why not? You are conflating uncertainty with data models/structures, which may be one of the problems.

]]>
Comment on Haklay et al 2001 by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4246&cpage=1#comment-74612 Tue, 29 Sep 2015 02:50:13 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4246#comment-74612 Please place your pseudonym at the bottom of the post–thanks!

]]>
Comment on GIS: Tool or Science? by sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4057&cpage=1#comment-74601 Mon, 14 Sep 2015 19:27:25 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=4057#comment-74601 Thanks, BannerGrey, for being the first post of GEOG506 2015!

]]>
Comment on AR: The issues left behind by C_N_Cycles https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=3257&cpage=1#comment-72824 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 19:39:52 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=3257#comment-72824 Correction: “Holodeck” in Star Trek example may not be truly considered AR. Instead think about the Holo-Graphic Doctor from Star Trek Voyager as AR.

]]>
Comment on How to handle scale? by Roshni https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=3136&cpage=1#comment-72662 Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:46:24 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=3136#comment-72662 I found fractals to be a very interesting way of thinking of the scale problem. wonder how much research goes into it!

]]>