Comments on: An ontology based on relational thinking https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1797 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:42:46 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.10 By: sieber https://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1797&cpage=1#comment-67853 Fri, 03 Feb 2012 04:37:21 +0000 http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=1797#comment-67853 Outside of Barry Smith, most ontologists draw their definition from computational ontology and not directly from philosophy. The “nature of being” becomes “what is this thing?” Also, you need to explain please explain why you don’t think these types of ontologies don’t contain relationships. Believe me, they do.

]]>