<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Participatory Geoweb - Web 1.0</title>
 <link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/47/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ClickHere</title>
 <link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/node/31</link>
 <description> &lt;p&gt;Web 1.0 vs. &lt;a class=&quot;glossary-term&quot; href=&quot;/geoide/taxonomy/term/162&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;A phrase coined by the book publisher, O&#039;Reilly, to describe the next generation of the web.
&quot;&gt;Web 2.0&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. O&#039;Reilly, Tim. &amp;quot;What is Web 2.0.&amp;quot; O&#039;Reilly Media. September 30, 2005. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/&quot;&gt;http://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-    in-depth explanation of web 2.0. very informative read.&lt;br /&gt;
-    comparison table of web 1.0 vs. 2.0.&lt;br /&gt;
-    data ownership and the advantages of web 2.0 (ex. Mapquest first had online mapping capabilities, but &lt;a href=&quot;/geoide/freelinking/GoogleMaps&quot; class=&quot;freelinking&quot;&gt;GoogleMaps&lt;/a&gt; allows for user annotations, yielding it greater success). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Strickland, Jonathan.  &amp;quot;Is there a Web 1.0?.&amp;quot;  28 January 2008.  &lt;a href=&quot;/geoide/freelinking/HowStuffWorks&quot; class=&quot;freelinking&quot;&gt;HowStuffWorks&lt;/a&gt;.com. &amp;lt;http://computer.howstuffworks.com/web-10.htm&amp;gt;  05 August 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;-    This site offers a basic introductory to web 1.0 / web 2.0.&lt;br /&gt;
-    Defines web 1.0 as static, not interactive, and web 1.0 applications are propriety (and therefore one can use the app. but cannot see how an app. works/change it). Web 2.0 programs are open source (source code freely available). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Graham, Paul. &amp;quot;Web 2.0.&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;/geoide/freelinking/PaulGraham&quot; class=&quot;freelinking&quot;&gt;PaulGraham&lt;/a&gt;.com. November, 2005. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html&quot;&gt;http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- web 2.0 = Ajax (web-applications work like desktop ones), democracy (people can change, create, add to something… wikipedia). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Spivack, Nova. &amp;quot;The Third-Generation Web is Coming.&amp;quot; KurzweilAL.net. 17 Dec. 2006. 5 Aug. 2008 &amp;lt;http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0689.html?m%3d3&amp;gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- introduces idea of web 3.0. evolution from web 2.0. revolves around ‘the intelligent web’.&lt;br /&gt;
- data-mining, machine learning, artificial intelligence technologies (YOU ask for something, the website knows what you want and can provide it to you). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have gathered:&lt;br /&gt;
Web 2.0 =&lt;br /&gt;
1.    interactive/participatory/social networking&lt;br /&gt;
2.     P2P&lt;br /&gt;
3.    free&lt;br /&gt;
4.    services (not packaged software), Ajax (?)&lt;br /&gt;
5.    “richer” user experience.&lt;br /&gt;
6.    Sites appear to be aiming for a web 2.0 perspective; many web 1.0 sites (news sites, etc) attempt to make this transition w/ blogs and comments. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ex. youtube, flickr, myspace, facebook, digg, bebo, blogspot, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
 <comments>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/node/31#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/47">Web 1.0</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/37">Web 2.0</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator />
 <guid isPermaLink="false">31 at http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
