<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Participatory Geoweb - community mapping network</title>
 <link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/111/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Allen presentation at GEOIDE 2009</title>
 <link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/node/178</link>
 <description>&lt;img src=&quot;http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/files/geoide/images/AllenGEOIDEposter.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Allen presentation at GEOIDE 2009&quot; title=&quot;Allen presentation at GEOIDE 2009&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview &quot; width=&quot;549&quot; height=&quot;640&quot; /&gt; &lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Transitioning To The &lt;a class=&quot;glossary-term&quot; href=&quot;/geoide/taxonomy/term/157&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;“Integrative, discoverable collection of geographically related web services and data that spans multiple jurisdictions and geographic regions” (Lake et al. 2007)

&quot;The Geoweb provides the means for interconnecting individual GIS databases. Desktop GIS can access and ingest data that’s found on the Geoweb as well as publish data to it. We can consume services that reside on the web, and can integrate different perspectives through the common network that is the web.

The Geoweb framework provides the means of integrating our collective knowledge. While there are means of consuming and representing our data in globes and maps, the entirety of the Geoweb is not yet a GIS. The barrier at present is largely data access and discovery, particularly when looking at the popular geographic exploration systems. There’s no access to data at the database level to unlock metadata and the multiple attributes that have been collected about our world. There’s also a lack of analysis functionality.&quot; (Ball 2008)&quot;&gt;Geoweb&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt;: The Changing Face Of Online Community Atlases, Patrick Allen, Jon Corbett&lt;/b&gt; This poster will present on a research project that investigates the status of online community atlases in British Columbia hosted by the Community Mapping Network (CMN). Since 1997, community atlases have been developed on the premise that emerging geographical information technologies (GIT) can facilitate participation in integrated and effective community land‐use planning and implementation. The majority of atlases on the CMN are the result of collaborative efforts involving government and non‐governmental partners. They often seek to gather and distribute land‐use related information. Using online and telephone interviews, the researchers surveyed community atlas managers and coordinators for 22 of 62 CMN hosted atlases. The survey sought to determine the current status of these atlases and gain insight into future directions for use, presentation and management of spatial data. As a sub‐component of this research, we reviewed the existing and potential role for incorporating &lt;a class=&quot;glossary-term&quot; href=&quot;/geoide/taxonomy/term/167&quot;&gt;&lt;acronym title=&quot;“Widespread engagement of large #s of private citizens, often with little formal qualifications in the creation of geographic information” (Goodchild 2007). A traditional example is the Audubon Society&#039;s Christmas Bird Count; more recent example is Open Street Maps.&quot;&gt;volunteered geographic information&lt;/acronym&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (VGI) into existing atlases, and determine issues that might emerge relating to user engagement and the management of VGI data. Of the atlases reviewed, most are now stagnant and unused; in many cases no changes or revisions have been made in over a year. Furthermore, no evaluations have been conducted on the existing data presented. Many respondents indicate that though their initial goal of providing open access to data has been met, the limited public use of the atlases does not justify the continued time, effort and funding required to manage the atlases over the long‐term. New atlases are still being developed with an awareness of these challenges and thus are increasingly attempting to be more user‐friendly, self managed and employ low cost methods of making information available and manageable. There is a growing interest the potential of the Geoweb to integrate free and open source software into atlas design, and to include interactive tools in order to engage users in accessing and contributing their own data to the atlases. However, there does not yet appear to be clarity on the best approach or model to follow in the ever changing world of GIT.&lt;/p&gt;
 </description>
 <comments>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/node/178#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/111">community mapping network</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/112">evaluation</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/1">participation</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/113">survey</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/18">VGI</category>
 <category domain="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide/taxonomy/term/102">poster gallery</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">178 at http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/geoide</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
