<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: March of the Penguins or March of the Conservatives?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=400</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:35:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: liam</title>
		<link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=400&#038;cpage=1#comment-1609</link>
		<dc:creator>liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=400#comment-1609</guid>
		<description>I have to say, the Intelligent Designer creating something like penguins is one whimsical deity (why aren&#039;t more deities given a sense of irony or whimsy?). It&#039;s not of much use trying to convince people who firmly believe in Intelligent Design away from it, as they aren&#039;t  basing their views on evidence anyways, pyrotechnic &#039;acts of god&#039; (hmmmm) might be the only way to sway thes .

Of course, I&#039;m obligated to mention, at least once, the marvelous theory of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Intelligent Falling&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, &#039;God&#039; if you will, is pushing them down&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, the Intelligent Designer creating something like penguins is one whimsical deity (why aren&#8217;t more deities given a sense of irony or whimsy?). It&#8217;s not of much use trying to convince people who firmly believe in Intelligent Design away from it, as they aren&#8217;t  basing their views on evidence anyways, pyrotechnic &#8216;acts of god&#8217; (hmmmm) might be the only way to sway thes .</p>
<p>Of course, I&#8217;m obligated to mention, at least once, the marvelous theory of <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512" rel="nofollow">Intelligent Falling</a>.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational force, but because a higher intelligence, &#8216;God&#8217; if you will, is pushing them down&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sieber</title>
		<link>http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=400&#038;cpage=1#comment-1608</link>
		<dc:creator>sieber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rose.geog.mcgill.ca/wordpress/?p=400#comment-1608</guid>
		<description>My colleague points out that many species of penguins have easier times reproducing and don&#039;t, for example, jeopardize their offspring nearly as much in the search for food. So why should the emperor penguin be held up as a model of intelligent design if these other, more efficient penguins are not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My colleague points out that many species of penguins have easier times reproducing and don&#8217;t, for example, jeopardize their offspring nearly as much in the search for food. So why should the emperor penguin be held up as a model of intelligent design if these other, more efficient penguins are not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
